People v Baez
2010 NY Slip Op 07070 [77 AD3d 406]
October 5, 2010
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
DanielBaez, Appellant.

[*1]Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Epstein of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Bari L. Kamlet of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Darcel D. Clark, J.), entered on or about August 14,2007, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender RegistrationAct (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although defendant challenges a particular 15-point assessment, even without that assessment hewould remain a level two offender, and we find no basis for a discretionary downward departure fromdefendant's presumptive risk level (seePeople v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). The mitigatingcircumstances cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessmentinstrument. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, McGuire, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.