People v Smith
2010 NY Slip Op 07086 [77 AD3d 990]
October 7, 2010
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daryl M.Smith, Appellant.

[*1]Sandra M. Colatosti, Albany, for appellant.

Weeden A. Wetmore, District Attorney, Elmira (Amanda M. Chafee of counsel), forrespondent.

Malone Jr., J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden,J.), rendered June 5, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of failure toregister under the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Defendant was convicted in 1996 of sexual abuse in the second degree, which required himto register under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C). He wasconvicted of failure to register in 2006 (see Correction Law § 168-t). Two yearslater, he again failed to comply with the registration requirements and was charged in anindictment with two counts of failure to register. Defendant pleaded guilty to one of the counts insatisfaction of the indictment and, as agreed, was sentenced to a jail term of one year.

Upon this appeal, defendant argues that the indictment was jurisdictionally defective due tothe People's failure to file a special information alleging that he had previously been convicted offailure to register, as required to raise the offenses charged from class E to class D felonies(see Correction Law § 168-t; CPL 200.60 [2]). The People did not seek to relyupon the prior conviction, however, and defendant pleaded guilty to failure to register as a classE felony. In any event, "an indictment is not rendered jurisdictionally defective even when theprosecution has failed to file a required special information and such a defect is deemed waivedby [*2]defendant's knowing and voluntary guilty plea" (Peoplev Williamson, 301 AD2d 860, 862 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 567 [2003]; see People v Downs, 26 AD3d525, 526 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 847 [2006]).

Mercure, J.P., McCarthy, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment isaffirmed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.