| People v Rodriguez |
| 2010 NY Slip Op 08915 [78 AD3d 1140] |
| November 30, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v Raymond Rodriguez, Appellant. |
—[*1] Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J.Dennehy of counsel; Gamaliel Marrero on the brief), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.),dated April 28, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuantto Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court failed to set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon whichits risk assessment determination was made, as required by Correction Law § 168-n (3).However, this Court may make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law where, as here,the record is sufficient to do so (see People v Guitard, 57 AD3d 751 [2008]; People vForney, 28 AD3d 446 [2006]).
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised itsdiscretion in denying his request for a downward departure from his presumptive level three sexoffender status as shown on the risk assessment instrument. The defendant failed to present clearand convincing evidence of a special circumstance warranting such a departure (see People vMcKee, 66 AD3d 854 [2009]; People v Cooke, 57 AD3d 750 [2008]; People vTaylor, 47 AD3d 907 [2008]; People v Richardson, 47 AD3d 905 [2008]; Peoplev Adams, 44 AD3d 1020 [2007]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.