| Malloy v Matute |
| 2010 NY Slip Op 09383 [79 AD3d 584] |
| December 21, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Norman Andrew Malloy, Appellant, v Felipe A. Matute,Respondent. |
—[*1] Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey & Moskovits, P.C., New York (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), forrespondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered on or about October 6,2009, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the groundthat plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d),unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion as to plaintiff's claim of serious injury to his rightknee, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff's submissions were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he suffered a"serious injury" to his right knee. While defendant's experts found that plaintiff's injuries weredegenerative, plaintiff's doctors were unanimous in concluding that the subject accident was the solecompetent producing cause of plaintiff's knee injuries, based upon (1) their individual examinations; (2)MRI results; and (3) the necessity of surgery to repair a tear in the medial meniscus, a partial tear of theanterior cruciate ligament, chondromalacia, synovitis, and fibrosis (see Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566 [2005]; Colon v Bernabe, 65 AD3d 969, 970[2009]). It also bears noting that plaintiff was 37 years old when he was hit on his right side bydefendant's taxi, he had no prior knee problems or injuries to his right leg, and his right knee surgerytook place within four months of the accident. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli,Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.