Gilmartin v City of New York
2011 NY Slip Op 00559
Decided on February 1, 2011
Appellate Division, First Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 1, 2011
Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Renwick, Freedman, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

4150 15268/07

[*1]Kevin Gilmartin, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

The City of New York, et al., Defendants, John O'Grady, et al., Defendants-Appellants.





Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success (Marshall D.
Sweetbaum of counsel), for appellants.
Dinkes & Schwitzer, P.C., New York (Naomi J. Skura of
counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry L. Schachner, J.), entered April 28, 2010, which, inter alia, denied the O'Grady defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants established that they are the owners of a single-family residential property and are therefore exempt from statutory liability for personal injury caused by the failure to maintain the sidewalk abutting their property in a reasonably safe condition (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-210[b]). However, they failed to establish their freedom from common-law liability by showing that they did not affirmatively cause or create the alleged defect in the sidewalk (see Otero v City of New York, 213 AD2d 339 [1995]). While defendants denied that they made any repairs to a raised portion of the sidewalk adjacent to a tree bench (which the parties agree is the site of plaintiff's fall), there is photographic evidence in the record that indicates a "patched" area on that portion of the sidewalk. In addition, while defendants claim to have observed that the elevation differential in the sidewalk was caused by the roots of the tree, as opposed to the tree bench, they also testified that the differential increased "slightly" after they installed the tree bench. These conflicting facts and credibility issues preclude summary judgment (see Ferrante v American Lung Assn., 90 NY2d 623, 631 [1997]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 1, 2011[*2]

CLERK


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.