People v Cruz
2011 NY Slip Op 00870
Decided on February 10, 2011
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 10, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

109 KA 09-00835

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

HECTOR R. CRUZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered April 3, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (three counts), criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.


ROBERT TUCKER, CANANDAIGUA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (JAMES B. RITTS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]), defendant contends that his plea was not voluntarily entered inasmuch as he entered the plea because of the length of his pre-plea incarceration and his desire to obtain medical treatment in a state prison. "[D]efendant failed to preserve that challenge for our review by moving to withdraw his plea or [raising that ground in his motion to] vacate the judgment of conviction" (People v Cloyd, 78 AD3d 1669, ___). We reject defendant's contention that this is one of those rare cases in which the exception to the preservation requirement applies (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666). The record establishes that County Court, "when confronted with statements casting significant doubt upon [the voluntariness of the plea], properly conducted further inquiry to ensure that [the] plea was . . . voluntary" (id. at 667-668; see People v High, 46 AD3d 1435, lv denied 10 NY3d 812). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: February 10, 2011
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.