People v Bailey
2011 NY Slip Op 01035
Decided on February 8, 2011
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 8, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
JOSEPH COVELLO
RUTH C. BALKIN
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.

2009-08604
(Ind. No. 63679/86)

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Willie Bailey, appellant.





Michael O'Brien, Syosset, N.Y., for appellant.
Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Douglas
Noll and Joanna Hershey of
counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Kase, J.), imposed September 1, 2009, which, upon the granting of his motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside a sentence of the same court (Winick, J.) imposed March 25, 1987, upon his conviction of sodomy in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, resentenced him as a persistent felony offender.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

On March 25, 1987, after the defendant was convicted at a jury trial of having forcibly sodomized another inmate at the Nassau County Correctional Center (see Penal Law former § 130.50[1]), he was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of 25 years to life. In February 2009, upon the People's concession that the predicate offenses were not violent felonies and that the defendant had thus improperly been sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender, the County Court granted the defendant's motion to set aside the sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20. Upon inquiry into the defendant's history and character, the County Court determined that the defendant should be resentenced as a persistent felony offender, and it resentenced him to an indeterminate prison term of 20 years to life.

The defendant's contention that New York's persistent felony offender statutes violate the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury is without merit (see People v Bell, 15 NY3d 935, 936; People v Battles, ___ NY3d ___, 2010 NY Slip Op 09160, *2 [2010]; People v Quinones, 12 NY3d 116, 128-131, cert deniedUS, 130 S Ct 104; People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61, 66, cert denied 546 US 984; People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329, 335, cert denied 534 US 899).
SKELOS, J.P., COVELLO, BALKIN and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:[*2]

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.