Matter of Ariel Kadijah S. v Ryszard B.
2011 NY Slip Op 01287
Decided on February 15, 2011
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 15, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

2010-01959
(Docket No. B-1249-08)

[*1]In the Matter of Ariel Kadijah S. (Anonymous). Dutchess County Department of Social Services, respondent;

and

Ryszard B. (Anonymous), appellant. Paul G. Callagy, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., for appellant.





James Fedorchak, County Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Laura
Gail Skojec of counsel), for respondent.
Nancy Tremarzo, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., attorney for the child.


DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the father's parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Sammarco, J.), entered December 29, 2009, which, upon a decision of the same court dated September 23, 2009, made after a fact-finding hearing, found that he permanently neglected the subject child, in effect, terminated his parental rights, transferred the guardianship and custody of the child to the Dutchess County Department of Social Services, and authorized the Dutchess County Department of Social Services to consent to the adoption of the child without the consent of or further notice to the father.

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing established, by clear and convincing evidence, that for a period of more than four years following the placement of the subject child with an authorized agency, the father failed to plan for the future of the child, although physically and financially able to do so, notwithstanding the agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 143; Matter of Hannan Nicolas G. [Jose G.], 78 AD3d 832; Matter of Daniel A.G. [Jose Ricardo G.], 78 AD3d 831; Matter of Michael T.M. [Steven M.], 74 AD3d 812, 813; Matter of Teshana Tracey T. [Janet T.], 71 AD3d 1032, 1033; Matter of Arthur C., 66 AD3d 1009, 1011; Matter of Ailayah Shawneque L., 40 AD3d 1097, 1098; Matter of Craig Robert B., 21 AD3d 412, 413).
SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.[*2]

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.