Chakrani v Beck Cab Corp.
2011 NY Slip Op 01591 [82 AD3d 436]
March 3, 2011
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 11, 2011


Hassan Chakrani, Respondent,
v
Beck Cab Corp. et al.,Appellants.

[*1]Feinman & Grossbard, P.C., White Plains (Steven N. Feinman of counsel), forappellants.

Marder, Eskesen & Nass, New York (Chad P. Ayoub of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered August 10, 2010, which,in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff was struck by a motor vehicle, denieddefendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed,without costs.

Defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Defendants'examining orthopedic surgeon found, inter alia, limited ranges of motion in plaintiff's cervicaland lumbar spines, as well as in his left ankle and foot. These findings clearly raise triable issuesof fact as to whether plaintiff sustained serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law§ 5102 (d) (see Servones vToribio, 20 AD3d 330 [2005]). Furthermore, even assuming that defendants had mettheir initial burden, plaintiff's submissions were sufficient to defeat the motion.Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, DeGrasse, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.