Matter of Rivera v Artus
2011 NY Slip Op 01910 [82 AD3d 1431]
March 17, 2011
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 11, 2011


In the Matter of Carlos Rivera, Petitioner, v Dale Artus, asSuperintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility Respondent.

[*1]Carlos Rivera, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), forrespondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the SupremeCourt, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of CorrectionalServices which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

As the result of an investigation, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with stalkinga female staff member. He was found guilty of the charge at the conclusion of a tier IIIdisciplinary hearing and the determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal. ThisCPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's claim, the confidential portion of the hearing transcriptreveals that the Hearing Officer adequately verified the reliability of the information provided bythe confidential source through his questioning of the correction officer who received thisinformation (see Matter of Butler vFischer, 74 AD3d 1651, 1652 [2010]; Matter of Benston v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1139, 1140 [2009]). Thisconfidential information, together with the misbehavior report and hearing testimony, providesubstantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Britt v Fischer, 54 AD3d 1087, 1087 [2008]; Matter of Samuel v Fischer, 53 AD3d960, 960 [2008]). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.[*2]

Mercure, J.P., Rose, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.