Matter of Isaiah J. (Janice J.)
2011 NY Slip Op 02466 [82 AD3d 651]
March 29, 2011
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 11, 2011


In the Matter of Isaiah J., an Infant. Janice J., Appellant; New YorkFoundling Hospital, Respondent.

[*1]Michael S. Bromberg, Sag Harbor, for appellant.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane Pazar of counsel), Attorneyfor the Child.

Law Office of Quinlan and Fields, Hawthorne (Daniel Gartenstein of counsel), forrespondent.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on orabout August 21, 2009, which, upon a finding of mental illness, terminated respondent mother'sparental rights and committed the child's custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and theCommissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption,unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding that respondent was mentally ill within the meaning of Social Services Law§ 384-b (4) (c) and (6) (a) was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The agencypresented uncontroverted testimony from a psychologist who, after reviewing respondent'smedical records, found that she suffered from schizoaffective disorder. This rendered herincapable of caring for the child presently and for the foreseeable future (see Matter of Roberto A. [AltagraciaA.], 73 AD3d 501, 501 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 703 [2010]).

Given the psychologist's unrebutted testimony and respondent's repeated requests foradjournments, the lapse in time between the psychological evaluation and the fact-findinghearing does not warrant a different result (see Matter of Robert K., 56 AD3d 353 [2008], lv denied 12NY3d 704 [2009]).[*2]

A dispositional hearing was not necessary to find thattermination of respondent's parental rights is in the child's best interests (see Matter of Ashanti A., 56 AD3d373, 374 [2008]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Acosta andManzanet-Daniels, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.