People v Coleman
2011 NY Slip Op 02975 [83 AD3d 1223]
April 14, 2011
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, June 8, 2011


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Earl Coleman,Appellant.

[*1]Jane M. Bloom, Rock Hill, for appellant.

James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Bonnie M. Mitzner of counsel), forrespondent.

Malone Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.),entered January 26, 2010, which denied defendant's motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL440.46.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the thirddegree following a jury trial and, in 2001, was sentenced as a persistent felony offender to anaggregate prison term of 15 years to life. County Court thereafter denied defendant's motion forresentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, finding him to be ineligible under the terms of that statute.Defendant now appeals.

We reverse. CPL 440.46 (4) affords indigent defendants the right to assigned counsel for "thepreparation of and proceedings on motions" made under that section. In his initial motion papers,defendant alleged that he was indigent and requested that counsel be assigned, but County Courttook no action to investigate that request. Contrary to the People's argument, the record is devoidof evidence that defendant wished to represent himself or that he was adequately warned of theperils of doing so; indeed, he reiterated his request that counsel be assigned after the Peopleargued that he was ineligible for resentencing (see People v James, 13 AD3d 649, 650 [2004], lv denied 5NY3d 764 [2005]). At a minimum, defendant's requests triggered County Court's "obligation toinquire further into [his] eligibility for and desire for the appointment of counsel," and we remitthis matter so that it may do so (People v McKiernan, 84 NY2d 915, 916[*2][1994]; see People v Ross, 67 NY2d 321, 325-326 [1986];People v Lasch, 309 AD2d 1086, 1087-1088 [2003]). In light of the foregoing,defendant's remaining arguments are academic.

Mercure, J.P., Rose, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on thelaw, and matter remitted to the County Court of Sullivan County for further proceedings notinconsistent with this Court's decision.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.