People v Hawkins
2011 NY Slip Op 03768 [84 AD3d 1736]
May 6, 2011
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, July 6, 2011


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maurice A.Hawkins, Appellant.

[*1]Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (David Juergens of counsel), fordefendant-appellant.

Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Joseph D. Waldorf of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joseph D. Valentino, J.),rendered August 24, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of attemptedmurder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and burglary in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of attemptedmurder in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]), assault in the firstdegree (§ 120.10 [1]), and burglary in the first degree (§ 140.30 [1], [2], [4]),defendant contends that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying his request for a missingwitness charge. We reject that contention (see People v Savinon, 100 NY2d 192, 197[2003]). Even assuming, arguendo, defendant met his initial burden in support of his request forthat charge by showing, inter alia, that the potential witness would be knowledgeable concerninga material issue at trial and would be expected to provide testimony that would be favorable tothe People (see People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427-428 [1986]), we conclude that thePeople met their burden of establishing "that the charge would not be appropriate" (id. at428). The prosecutor established that the missing witness would have provided certain testimonythat was cumulative to that of other witnesses (see People v White, 265 AD2d 843,843-844 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 868 [1999]), and that the witness otherwise wouldnot be expected to provide testimony that was favorable to the People's case (see People vWilson, 256 AD2d 637, 638 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 880 [1999]; People vCongilaro, 159 AD2d 964, 965 [1990], lv denied 76 NY2d 786 [1990]).Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Carni, Sconiers and Green, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.