People v Palmer
2011 NY Slip Op 07020 [88 AD3d 676]
October 4, 2011
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 7, 2011


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Michael Palmer, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Anna Pervukhin of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Linda Breen ofcounsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), datedFebruary 16, 2010, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated hima level two sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, in determining his risk level under the Sex OffenderRegistration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C), the Supreme Court properly assessedpoints under risk factor 11, pertaining to "[d]rug or [a]lcohol [a]buse," based upon his admissionthat he was using alcohol at the time of the offense (Sex Offender Registration Act: RiskAssessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 15 [2006]; see People v Sterling, 71 AD3d 654 [2010]; People v Britt, 66 AD3d 853[2009]; People v Carpenter, 60AD3d 833 [2009]). Accordingly, the defendant was properly designated a level two sexoffender. Mastro, J.P., Florio, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.