| Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v Grant |
| 2011 NY Slip Op 07594 [88 AD3d 929] |
| October 25, 2011 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Respondent, v Philip Grant,Appellant, et al., Defendants. |
—[*1] Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & Barry, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Margaret J. Cascino ofcounsel) for respondent.
In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Philip Grant appeals from ajudgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), entered March 18, 2010, which,upon an order of the same court dated May 29, 2008, among other things, directed the sale of thesubject premises.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant's challenge to the sufficiency of the content of the default notice and claims ofviolations of the Home Equity Theft Prevention Act (Real Property Law § 265-a) andFederal Truth-in-Lending Act (15 USC § 1601 et seq.) are not properly before thisCourt.
The remaining issues raised by the appellant have been previously raised and resolved on hisprior appeal to this Court from the order dated May 29, 2008 (see Aurora Loan Servs. v Grant, 70 AD3d 986 [2010]). There areno extraordinary circumstances that warrant reconsidering our prior determination (see Pekich v James E. Lawrence, Inc.,38 AD3d 632, 633 [2007]). Accordingly, under the doctrine of law of the case, furtherreview of those issues is barred (seeFrankson v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 67 AD3d 213, 217 [2009]).Angiolillo, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.