People v Rosado
2011 NY Slip Op 07617 [88 AD3d 974]
October 25, 2011
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 7, 2011


The People of State of New York, Respondent,
v
MarshallRosado, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Erin R. Collins of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J.Dennehy of counsel; Elisheva Mochkin on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.),dated August 10, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuantto Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downwarddeparture from his presumptive risk level and, thus, properly designated him a level two sexoffender (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 [2011]; People v Livingston, 87AD3d 628 [2011]; People vAlston, 86 AD3d 553, 554 [2011]; People v Rodriguez, 67 AD3d 596, 597 [2009]; People v Adams, 44 AD3d 1020[2007]; People v Wragg, 41 AD3d1273, 1274 [2007]; cf. People vStevens, 55 AD3d 892, 894 [2008]).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Eng and Cohen,JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.