People v Vega
2011 NY Slip Op 07664 [88 AD3d 1022]
October 25, 2011
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 7, 2011


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Reggie Vega, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Winston McIntosh of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Sharon Y.Brodt of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gavrin, J.),rendered October 15, 2007, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon hisplea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing onthe defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant shall be appointednew counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter, and the appeal is held inabeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court's report. The Supreme Court, Queens County,shall file its report with all convenient speed.

At sentencing, the defendant, in effect, moved to withdraw his plea of guilty. The defendant'sright to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney, in effect, became a witness against himand took a position adverse to him with respect to the motion at sentencing (see People v Dixon, 63 AD3d 957,957 [2009]; People v Bedoya, 53AD3d 621, 621 [2008]; People vArmstead, 35 AD3d 624, 626 [2006]; People v Bryant, 22 AD3d 676, 677 [2005]). The Supreme Courtshould have assigned a different attorney to represent the defendant before it determined thedefendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see People v Dixon, 63 AD3d at 957;People v Bedoya, 53 AD3d at 621). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the SupremeCourt, Queens County, for a hearing on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, forwhich the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motionthereafter. We hold the appeal in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court's report. Weexpress no opinion as to the merits of the defendant's motion and we decide no other issues atthis time. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Dickerson and Lott, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.