People v Pemberton
2012 NY Slip Op 01689 [93 AD3d 681]
March 6, 2012
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, April 25, 2012


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
TerrieD. Pemberton, Appellant.

[*1]

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel ofcounsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.),imposed March 21, 2011, which, upon his conviction of sodomy in the first degree, imposed aperiod of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previouslyimposed on August 21, 2001.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentence ofimprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorilyrequired period of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due processclauses of the United States Constitution (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Ralph, 91 AD3d 796[2012]; People v Algarin, 89 AD3d859 [2011]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Eng, Chambers, Sgroiand Miller, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.