Dollard v WB/Stellar IP Owner, LLC
2012 NY Slip Op 04825 [96 AD3d 533]
June 14, 2012
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 1, 2012


Rose Welsh Dollard, Plaintiff,
v
WB/Stellar IP Owner,LLC, et al.,Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.) WB/Stellar IP Owner, LLC, Second Third-PartyPlaintiff-Respondent, v New York City Economic Development Corporation, SecondThird-Party Defendant, and Friends of Greenwich Street, Inc., Second Third-PartyDefendant-Appellant.

[*1]

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York (Dan C. Kozusko of counsel), for appellant.

Brill & Associates, P.C., New York (Corey M. Reichardt of counsel), forrespondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered November 4, 2011,which denied the motion of second third-party defendant Friends of Greenwich Street, Inc.(Friends) to dismiss the second third-party complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed,without costs.

Plaintiff was injured when she allegedly tripped and fell on a cracked and uneven portion ofthe sidewalk that abutted a building owned by defendant/second third-party plaintiff WB/StellarIP Owner, LLC (Stellar). Stellar commenced this second third-party action against, inter alia,Friends and asserted claims for contribution and common-law indemnification.

"In assessing a motion under CPLR 3211 (a) (7) . . . a court may freely consideraffidavits submitted by the [nonmoving party] to remedy any defects in the complaint and thecriterion is whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action, not whether he has statedone" (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994] [internal quotation marks and citationsomitted]). Here, the court properly concluded that the pleadings together with the affidavit fromStellar's property manager sufficiently alleged claims for contribution and common-lawindemnification against Friends. Stellar and its property manager stated that Friends installed,inspected and [*2]maintained the portion of the sidewalk onwhich plaintiff fell and that it did so in a negligent manner (see generally Raquet v Braun,90 NY2d 177, 182-183 [1997]; seeVelez v 19-27 Orchard St. LLC, 70 AD3d 488 [2010]; Peretich v City of NewYork, 263 AD2d 410, 411 [1999]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny,Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op32921(U).]


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.