People v Batista
2012 NY Slip Op 07311 [100 AD3d 650]
November 7, 2012
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 26, 2012
As corrected through Wednesday, December 26, 2012


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
JoseBatista, Appellant.

[*1]Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel; BenjaminJ. Stanger on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly,J.), rendered December 9, 2009, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea ofguilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6NY3d 248 [2006]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim.However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (seePeople v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant's remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are withoutmerit. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.