People v Santiago
2012 NY Slip Op 09090 [101 AD3d 1155]
December 26, 2012
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, February 6, 2013


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
JonSantiago, Appellant.

[*1]Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaumof counsel; David Xu on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court,Kings County (D'Emic, J.), both imposed May 24, 2011, on the ground, inter alia, that thesentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal(see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d248, 256 [2006]; People vWright, 89 AD3d 874, 874-875 [2011]).

However, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant'srequest for youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20 [1]). Moreover, the sentencesimposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P.,Rivera, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.