Matter of Diamond J. (Nakesha J.)
2013 NY Slip Op 00208 [102 AD3d 784]
January 16, 2013
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, February 27, 2013


In the Matter of Diamond J., an Infant. Administration forChildren's Services, Appellant; Nakesha J., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In theMatter of Isaac L., an Infant. Administration for Children's Services, Appellant; NakeshaJ., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Dynasia J., an Infant. Administrationfor Children's Services, Appellant; Nakesha J., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 3.) In theMatter of Linwood Mc., an Infant. Administration for Children's Services, Appellant;Nakesha J., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 4.) In the Matter of Wanasia C., an Infant.Administration for Children's Services, Appellant; Nakesha J., Respondent. (ProceedingNo. 5.)

[*1]Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Pamela SeiderDolgow and Suzanne K. Colt of counsel), for appellant.

Christopher J. Robles, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Tamara A. Steckler and Patricia Colella of counsel),attorney for the children.

In five related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, theAdministration for Children's Services appeals from an order of the Family Court, KingsCounty (Weinstein, J.), dated March 1, 2012, which, after a fact-finding hearing, grantedthe mother's motion to dismiss the petitions.[*2]

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costsor disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly granted the mother'smotion to dismiss the petitions. The petitioner failed to prove by a preponderance of theevidence that the mother's drug use caused impairment, or an imminent danger ofimpairment, to the physical, mental, or emotional condition of the subject children(see Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [f] [i] [B]; 1046 [a]; Matter of Anastasia G., 52AD3d 830, 832 [2008]). Rivera, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.