People v Gajadhar
2013 NY Slip Op 01211 [103 AD3d 572]
February 26, 2013
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 27, 2013


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Kamal Gajadhar, Appellant.

[*1]Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Arthur H. Hopkirk ofcounsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Nicole Coviello of counsel), forrespondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Conviser, J.), entered on orabout June 14, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offenderpursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimouslyaffirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downwarddeparture from defendant's presumptive risk level (see People v Cintron, 12NY3d 60, 70 [2009], sub nom. Knox v New York, 558 US 1011 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d416, 418, 421 [2008]). The circumstances of the underlying crime were egregious,and they indicated a potential that a reoffense by defendant would cause a high degree ofharm. Defendant has not shown that his age (late 40s) or any of the other factors he citeswarranted a downward departure. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz,DeGrasse and Román, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.