People v Rogers
2013 NY Slip Op 02273 [105 AD3d 776]
April 3, 2013
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 29, 2013


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Anthony Rogers, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Ellen Fried of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L.Mandel of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J.Goldberg, J.), imposed October 28, 2008, upon his conviction of robbery in the seconddegree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, theresentence being a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate termsof imprisonment previously imposed on March 22, 2000.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence ofimprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to include the statutorilyrequired period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy orviolate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Louis, 90 AD3d1075 [2011]; People vDawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P., Chambers,Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 21 Misc 3d 1131(A), 2008NY Slip Op 52313(U).]


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.