People v Gillett
2013 NY Slip Op 02947 [105 AD3d 1444]
April 26, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 29, 2013


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v JodyB. Gillett, Appellant.

[*1]Keliann M. Elniski, Orchard Park, for defendant-appellant.

Lawrence Friedman, District Attorney, Batavia (William G. Zickl of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.),rendered March 21, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, ofcriminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea ofguilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02[1]). Defendant's contention that County Court erred in failing to conduct a hearing onhis challenge to the voluntariness of his statements to the police does not survive hisguilty plea. "A guilty plea generally results in a forfeiture of the right to appellate reviewof any nonjurisdictional defects in the proceedings" (People v Fernandez, 67NY2d 686, 688 [1986]), and the exception set forth in CPL 710.70 (2) does not applyhere because defendant pleaded guilty before the court issued a decision on hissuppression motion (seegenerally People v Elmer, 19 NY3d 501, 507-508 [2012]). Defendant'schallenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury with respect to thethird count of the indictment likewise does not survive the guilty plea (see People v Smith, 28 AD3d1202, 1202 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 818 [2006]; see generally People vIannone, 45 NY2d 589, 600-601 [1978]). Finally, defendant's contention that he wasdenied effective assistance of counsel "does not survive his guilty plea . . .because there was no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by [the]allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of hisattorney['s] allegedly poor performance" (People v Dean, 48 AD3d 1244, 1245 [2008], lv denied10 NY3d 839 [2008] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Present—Scudder,P.J., Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.