| People v Cedeno |
| 2013 NY Slip Op 04019 [107 AD3d 734] |
| June 5, 2013 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v Luis Cedeno, Appellant. |
—[*1] Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and JoyceSlevin of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County(Dwyer J.), rendered September 30, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the seconddegree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contentionthat the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d737 [2006]).
The defendant's contention concerning the duration of certain orders of protectionsurvives his valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Smith, 83 AD3d 1213 [2011]; People v Allen, 64 AD3d1190, 1191 [2009]; Peoplev Victor, 20 AD3d 927, 928 [2005]). The defendant, however, failed to preservethis contention for appellate review, since he neither raised this issue at sentencing normoved to amend the final orders of protection on this ground (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Nieves, 2NY3d 310, 316-318 [2004]; People v Remington, 90 AD3d 678, 679 [2011]; People v Foster, 87 AD3d299, 304 [2011]; People vMaxineau, 78 AD3d 732, 732 [2010]; People v Langhorne, 60 AD3d 867 [2009]), and we declineto review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Mastro, J.P., Rivera,Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.