People v Bond
2013 NY Slip Op 05580 [109 AD3d 481]
August 7, 2013
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 25, 2013


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Mitchell Bond, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), forappellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano andUshir Pandit of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the SupremeCourt, Queens County (Hollie, J.), imposed August 5, 2011, on the ground that thesentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

When the Supreme Court explained the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal tohim, it improperly conflated the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited bya guilty plea. Accordingly, the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Curras, 105 AD3d 973 [2013]). However, thesentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.