People v King
2013 NY Slip Op 06875 [110 AD3d 1005]
October 23, 2013
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, November 27, 2013


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Nidamark King, Appellant.

[*1]Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (John M. Dowden of counsel), forappellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael Blakey of counsel),for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County(Condon, J.), rendered June 23, 2011, convicting him of burglary in the first degree (twocounts), robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (threecounts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in thesecond degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, and assault in the seconddegree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for reviewthe denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which wasto suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to the review of his claimregarding the People's alleged failure to comply with CPL 710.30 (see People vTaylor, 65 NY2d 1 [1985]; People v La Bar, 16 AD3d 1084 [2005]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P., Cohen, Millerand Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.