| Centeno v 575 E. 137th St. Real Estate, Inc. |
| 2013 NY Slip Op 07689 [111 AD3d 531] |
| November 19, 2013 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Neftali Centeno, Appellant, v 575 E. 137th St.Real Estate, Inc., Respondent. |
—[*1] Gannon, Rosenfarb, Balletti & Drossman, New York (Lisa L. Gokhulsingh ofcounsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered on or aboutOctober 16, 2012, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissingthe complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff failed to show that the trapdoor through which he fell suffered from astructural or design defect in violation of a specific statutory provision, as required toimpose liability upon defendant, an out-of-possession landlord (see Kittay v Moskowitz, 95AD3d 451 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 859 [2013]; Devlin v Blaggards III Rest.Corp., 80 AD3d 497 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 16 NY3d 713 [2011]).The stairway beneath the trapdoor served as a means of providing easy access betweenthe upstairs store room and the basement. There is no evidence that it provided a meansof egress from the building. Accordingly, Administrative Code of City of NY §27-375 (Interior stairs) is not applicable, since "interior stair" is defined as "[a] stairwithin a building, that serves as a required exit" (Administrative Code § 27-232;see Cusumano v City of NewYork, 15 NY3d 319, 324 [2010]). Administrative Code § 28-301.1,which repeals and re-codifies former sections 27-127 and 27-128 (see McLaughlin v Ann-Gur RealtyCorp., 107 AD3d 469, 469 [1st Dept 2013]), is also unavailing. Sections 27-127and 27-128 were merely nonspecific safety provisions (Ram v 64th St.-Third Ave. Assoc.,LLC, 61 AD3d 596, 597 [1st Dept 2009]; see Kittay, 95 AD3d at 452).[*2]
Similarly unavailing is Administrative Code§ 27-126, which was merely a nonspecific provision defining certain work asnonminor. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels andFeinman, JJ.