Matter of Christopher RR. v St. Lawrence County Dept. ofSocial Servs.
2014 NY Slip Op 00148 [113 AD3d 899]
January 9, 2014
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 5, 2014


In the Matter of Christopher RR., Appellant, v St.Lawrence County Department of Social Services et al.,Respondents.

[*1]Pro Bono Appeals Program, Albany (Alan J. Pierce of counsel), for appellant.

Barry J. Jones, Hudson Falls, attorney for the child.

Peters, P.J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of St. Lawrence County(Morris, J.), entered May 15, 2012, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Actarticle 6, granted a motion by the attorney for the child to dismiss the petition.

The child who is the subject of the instant proceeding (born in 2010) was removedfrom the care of his mother at birth and placed in the custody of respondent St. LawrenceCounty Department of Social Services. After petitioner was determined to be the child'sfather, he commenced this proceeding by order to show cause seeking custody. At theinitial appearance, the attorney for the child made an oral motion to dismiss the petition.Family Court granted the motion and dismissed the petition without prejudice, promptingthis appeal by petitioner.

A proper record on appeal must include any relevant documents and transcripts ofthe proceedings before the lower court (see CPLR 5526; Clarke v Clarke, 90 AD3d690, 691 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 805 [2012]; Matter of Pratt v Anthony, 30AD3d 708, 708 [2006]). The transcript of the appearance before Family Court atwhich the attorney for the child orally moved to dismiss the petition is not included in therecord, and no other documentation reveals the [*2]grounds for that motion.[FN*] Moreover, Family Court's order dismissing the petition references "due deliberation" butarticulates no basis for dismissal. Accordingly, the record is inadequate to enable thisCourt to render an informed decision on the merits, and the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Butti v Butti, 92AD3d 781, 782 [2012]; Matter of Pratt v Anthony, 30 AD3d at 708).

Rose, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, withoutcosts.

Footnotes


Footnote *: Notably, counselrepresented at oral argument that his request to the clerk of the Family Court for atranscript of the relevant proceeding went unanswered.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.