People v Batista
2014 NY Slip Op 00675 [114 AD3d 696]
February 5, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 26, 2014


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Jonathan Batista, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Paul Skip Laisure of counsel), forappellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, MerriT. Lasky, and Christine DiSalvo of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the SupremeCourt, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed February 15, 2011, on the ground that thesentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d803, 803 [2012]), and, thus, does not preclude his excessive sentence claim.However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.