People v Rennick
2014 NY Slip Op 09154 [123 AD3d 1146]
December 31, 2014
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 28, 2015


[*1]
 The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Ahmad Rennick, Appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove andMorgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the SupremeCourt, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed November 30, 2012, on the ground that thesentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and, thus, doesnot preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed wasnot excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Rivera,Austin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.