Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York,New York County (Diana M. Boyar, J.), rendered October 5, 2012, convicting her, upona plea of guilty, of harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Diana M. Boyar, J.), rendered October 5, 2012,affirmed.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, we find the record sufficient toestablish defendant's understanding and waiver of her Boykin rights (seeBoykin v Alabama, 395

US 238 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 366 [2013]), and of her entryof an otherwise knowing and voluntary guilty plea. In full satisfaction of an accusatoryinstrument charging defendant with, inter alia, two counts of assault in the third degree,defendant pleaded guilty to a single count of second degree harassment, a violation, inreturn for a negotiated sentence of time served. In defendant's presence, defense counselacknowledged that defendant agreed to waive "formal allocution," and defendantpersonally confirmed, in response to the court's questioning, that she was pleading guiltyof her own free will and understood that she was giving up her right to trial. A plea ofguilty "will not be invalidated solely because the Trial Judge failed to specificallyenumerate all the rights to which the defendant was entitled and to elicit from him or hera list of detailed waivers before accepting the guilty plea' " (People v Tyrell, 22NY3d at 365, quoting People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16, [1983]). This isparticularly so where, as here, "the record shows that defendant had ample opportunity toreview her options in consultation with counsel" (People v Perez, 116 AD3d 511,———— [2014]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: December 31, 2014