Eshaghian v Roshanzamir
2015 NY Slip Op 03032 [127 AD3d 448]
April 9, 2015
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, June 3, 2015


[*1]
 Elyass Eshaghian et al., Respondents,
v
AsherRoshanzamir, Appellant.

Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York (Herman Cahn ofcounsel), for appellant.

Wilk Auslander LLP, New York (Stuart M. Riback of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered November22, 2013, which granted plaintiffs' motion to renew defendant's motion to dismiss thecomplaint, and, upon renewal, denied defendant's motion, unanimously affirmed, withoutcosts.

The agreement of sale and purchase between defendant LLC and nonparty 587 FifthJV, LLC, constitutes a new fact within the meaning of CPLR 2221 (e) (2). Defendant'sclaim that plaintiff knew of or approved the contract is without support in the record,which shows that plaintiff learned of the contract only when 587 Fifth commenced anaction to enforce it, and received the full contract only when the contract was producedin connection with that action.

The court correctly found that the terms of the contract would change its priordetermination (see id.).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.