| People v Singleton |
| 2015 NY Slip Op 04672 [129 AD3d 748] |
| June 3, 2015 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
[*1]
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v David Singleton, Also Known as Kim Graves,Appellant. |
Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel; JessicaTsant on the brief), for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove andThomas M. Ross of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of theSupreme Court, Kings County (Jeong, J.), all imposed December 20, 2012.
Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d248, 256 [2006]; People vBrown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]). The record does not demonstrate that thedefendant "grasped the concept of the appeal waiver and the nature of the right he wasforgoing" (People vBradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; see People v Michael, 120 AD3d 713 [2014]; People v Johnson, 113 AD3d635 [2014]). Notwithstanding the defendant's execution of the written waiver form,it cannot be said that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right toappeal (see People v Brown, 122 AD3d at 145-146) and, therefore, review of hisexcessive sentence claims is not precluded.
The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80[1982]). Eng, P.J., Dillon, Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.