| Liang v Yi Jing Tan |
| 2016 NY Slip Op 04915 [140 AD3d 1029] |
| June 22, 2016 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
[*1]
| Gary Liang, Respondent, v Yi Jing Tan et al.,Appellants. |
Wei Ji, New York, NY, for appellants.
Wang Law Office, PLLC, Flushing, NY (William R. Stoltz and Chunyu Jean ofcounsel), for respondent.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion and breach of fiduciaryduty, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays,J.), dated October 13, 2014, which denied their motion, denominated as one "for leave toreargue and reconsider" their prior motion, among other things, for a hearing on the issueof bribery of a witness, which was denied in an order of the same court dated June 26,2014.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The defendants' motion, denominated as one "for leave to reargue and reconsider" anorder dated June 26, 2014, denying their motion, inter alia, for a hearing on the issue ofbribery of a witness, is, in actuality, a motion for reargument. As the denial of a motionfor reargument is not appealable (see George v Yoma Dev. Group, Inc., 83 AD3d 776[2011]; Coccia v Liotti, 70AD3d 747, 759 [2010];Tokio Mar. & Fire Ins. Co., Ltd. v Borgia, 11 AD3d 603, 604 [2004]), theappeal must be dismissed (see George v Yoma Dev. Group, Inc., 83 AD3d at776; Fahey v County of Nassau, 111 AD2d 214, 214 [1985]). Mastro, J.P.,Dickerson, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.