| People v Ramsood |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 03860 [161 AD3d 1198] |
| May 30, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
[*1]
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v Totram Ramsood, Appellant. |
Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, JohnnetteTraill, and Christopher J. Blira-Koessler of counsel; Anisha Mirchandani on the brief), forrespondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elisa S.Koenderman, J.), rendered September 23, 2013, convicting him of attempted rape in the seconddegree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his plea of guilty was not entered voluntarily because theSupreme Court failed to adequately advise him of the immigration consequences of his plea.Specifically, the defendant contends that, since his conviction will result in his mandatorydeportation, the court was required to advise him that he would definitely be deported if hepleaded guilty.
The defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise the issueor move to withdraw his plea despite indicating on the record that he was aware that there couldbe immigration consequences to pleading guilty (see People v Pastor, 28 NY3d 1089, 1091 [2016]; People v Peque, 22 NY3d 168, 183[2013]; People v Sanchez, 152AD3d 548, 548 [2017]). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit. "[A]s partof its independent obligation to ascertain whether a defendant is pleading guilty voluntarily, atrial court must alert a noncitizen defendant that he or she may be deported as a consequence ofthe plea of guilty" (People vLopez-Alvarado, 149 AD3d 981, 981 [2017]; see People v Peque, 22 NY3d at193; People v Dennis, 140 AD3d789, 789 [2016]). Although no particular litany is required, "[t]he trial court must provide ashort, straightforward statement on the record notifying the defendant that, in sum and substance,if the defendant is not a United States citizen, he or she may be deported upon a guilty plea"(People v Peque, 22 NY3d at 197; see People v Lopez-Alvarado, 149 AD3d at981).
Here, the record demonstrates that the Supreme Court, among other things, advised thedefendant that "this plea may result in you being removed from the United States" (see Peoplev Peque, 22 NY3d at 197; People v Sanchez, 152 AD3d at 548; People v Mohammad, 148 AD3d1185, 1185-1186 [2017]; People vEgbunike, 133 AD3d 776, 777 [2015]). The defendant's contention that the court wasrequired to advise the defendant that he would definitely be deported upon pleading guilty [*2]is without merit (see People v Jimenez, 150 AD3d 408, 409 [2017]; People v Manuel, 143 AD3d 473,474 [2016]; see also People v Mohammad, 148 AD3d at 1185-1186). Scheinkman, P.J.,Leventhal, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.