| People v James |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 06113 [164 AD3d 1363] |
| September 19, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
[*1]
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v Odell A. James, Appellant. |
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, JohnnetteTraill, and Anastasia Spanakos of counsel; Eleanor Reilly on the memorandum), forrespondent.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court,Queens County (Barry Kron, J.), imposed April 13, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the groundthat the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Vinson, 161 AD3d1109 [2018]; People vRosa-Cruz, 159 AD3d 837 [2018]) because the record of the colloquy does notdemonstrate that the defendant understood the distinction between the rights automaticallywaived by a plea of guilty and the waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248,257 [2006]). In addition, there is no indication in the record as to whether the defendant read andunderstood the written waiver or discussed the written waiver with counsel (see People v Johnson, 157 AD3d964 [2018]). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude review of the defendant'sexcessive sentence claim (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 257). However, the sentenceimposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Dillon, J.P., Sgroi,Hinds-Radix, Brathwaite Nelson and Iannacci, JJ., concur.