| People v Broderick |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 06930 [165 AD3d 972] |
| October 17, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
[*1]
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v Clifton Broderick, Appellant. |
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan ofcounsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court,Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), imposed February 28, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on theground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Although the defendant has served his sentence, the question of whether the sentenceimposed should be reduced is not academic, because the sentence imposed has potentialimmigration consequences (see People vAyala, 142 AD3d 1095, 1095 [2016]; People v Aisewomhonio, 131 AD3d 1177, 1178 [2015]).Considering all the relevant circumstances of this case, we conclude that the sentence imposedwas not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Balkin, J.P., Chambers,Roman, Maltese and Connolly, JJ., concur.