People v Austin
2008 NY Slip Op 07103 [54 AD3d 916]
September 23, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, October 29, 2008


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Thomas Austin, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (William Kastin of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart andLauren-Brooke Eisen of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.),dated December 6, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offenderpursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court's determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offenderbased upon a "presumptive override" factor, namely, that the defendant had "a prior felonyconviction for a sex crime," is supported by clear and convincing evidence and, thus, should notbe disturbed (see People v Juarbe,36 AD3d 602 [2007]; People vClinkscales, 18 AD3d 726 [2005]).

The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Lamberty, 45 AD3d486 [2007]; People v Douglas,18 AD3d 967, 968 [2005]; cf.People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004]). Fisher, J.P., Balkin, McCarthy andChambers, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.