People v Copeland
2010 NY Slip Op 09112 [79 AD3d 716]
December 7, 2010
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, February 16, 2011


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
MarkCopeland, Appellant.

[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), datedSeptember 6, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him as a level two sex offender pursuant toCorrection Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court's designation of him as a level two sexoffender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA) wassupported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]). TheCounty Court properly assessed 25 points under risk factor two and 20 points under risk factor four(see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 9-10[2006]). The victim's sworn statement and the presentence report, offered by the People at the SORAhearing, constituted "reliable hearsay" (Correction Law § 168-n [3]; see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563,573-574 [2009]), and provided a sufficient basis for the assessment of those points (see People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406,408-409 [2010]; People v Johnson, 77AD3d 897 [2010]).

Moreover, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's requestfor a downward departure, as the defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of amitigating factor "of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by theguidelines" (SORA: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; see People v Cruz, 74 AD3d 1305,1306 [2010]; People v Colavito, 73AD3d 1004, 1005 [2010]; People vBowens, 55 AD3d 809, 810 [2008]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Charache, 9 NY3d 829,830 [2007]; People v McElhearn, 56AD3d 978, 979 [2008]). Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.