U.S. Bank N.A. v Losner
2015 NY Slip Op 00869 [125 AD3d 640]
February 4, 2015
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, April 1, 2015


[*1]
 U.S. Bank National Association,Respondent,
v
Ronald B. Losner, Appellant, et al.,Defendants.

Biolsi Law Group P.C., New York, N.Y. (Steven Alexander Biolsi of counsel), forappellant.

Knuckles, Komosinski & Elliott LLP, Elmsford, N.Y. (Christopher Messina ofcounsel), for respondent.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Ronald B. Losner appeals froman order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J.), entered August 26, 2014,which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same courtentered July 11, 2008, which had been entered upon his failure to answer thecomplaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Ronald B. Losner (hereinafter the defendant) sought to vacate ajudgment of foreclosure and sale, which had been entered upon his failure to answer thecomplaint, on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. Pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (4),a judgment entered upon a movant's default must be vacated once the movantdemonstrates lack of jurisdiction (see Hossain v Fab Cab Corp., 57 AD3d 484 [2008]; Matter of Qadeera Tonezia D.,55 AD3d 606 [2008]). Although a process server's affidavit of service ordinarilyconstitutes prima facie evidence of proper service (see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Pestano, 71 AD3d1074 [2010]; Bankers Trust Co. of Cal. v Tsoukas, 303 AD2d 343, 343-344[2003]), a defendant may rebut the prima facie showing with a sworn denial of receipt ofprocess containing specific facts to refute the process server's affidavit (see BankersTrust Co. of Cal. v Tsoukas, 303 AD2d 343 [2003]; see also Deutsche Bank Natl. TrustCo. v Pestano, 71 AD3d 1074 [2010]; Wern v D'Alessandro, 219 AD2d646 [1995]; Frankel v Schilling, 149 AD2d 657 [1989]). Here, the SupremeCourt correctly determined that the defendant's affidavit was insufficient to rebut theprocess server's affidavit, and therefore, properly denied the defendant's motion to vacatethe judgment of foreclosure and sale. Rivera, J.P., Hall, Roman, Cohen and Barros, JJ.,concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.